Kafkaesque Resonances in World Theatre: Introductory Note

Aikaterini Delikonstantinidou*

In recent decades, individuals from diverse cultural contexts and socioeconomic tiers increasingly perceive government institutions, state bureaucracies and corporate apparatuses as impersonal structures indifferent to their needs. At the same time, fundamental human rights are being systematically eroded through mass surveillance, pervasive data collection and the loss of privacy—practices often intertwined with fact-resistant political narratives that fuel misinformation-driven politics. Paradoxically, despite unprecedented technological hyperconnectivity, many people report a growing sense of disconnection, isolation and diminished agency, struggling to find meaning and purpose in interpersonal relationships, in social interactions, in the very process of navigating the opaque systems that make up reality. These facets of modern existence resonate deeply with Franz Kafka’s portrayal of the world and the human condition in his literary works.

The particular brand of absurdity, unease, discontent and surreal oppression that has often been referred to as the Kafkaesque, derived from the works of the Czech writer, seems to permeate our lives today. Kafkaesque scenarios which depict individuals grappling with incomprehensible bureaucracies, alienation, elusive truth and an overwhelming sense of dread in an illogical or malevolent world remain deeply relevant to our familiar yet increasingly strange sociopolitical landscapes.

Because of his lingering relevance to universal human concerns, Kafka’s keen grasp of absurdity and dread provides a springboard for scholars and artists to explore complexities of identity, authority and morality relevant to the current stage of our existential crisis. Of late, this concern has given rise to a range of perceptive and intrepid theatrical adaptations tackling themes integral to the Kafkaesque universe; a sinister but uncannily insightful realm where individuals are ensnared by impenetrable rules, ambiguous truths and omnipresent yet intangible authorities.

Indeed, theatre lends itself well to Kafkaesque narratives, since it can visually and viscerally immerse audiences in Kafka-inspired unsettling worlds, at its best leaving the spectator as unsettled and introspective as the characters on stage.

Many contemporary theatrical works trace Kafkaesque’s connections to both the tragic and the comic mode, tapping into its fusion of dark themes with absurd or surreal elements. Thus, they create a space in which tragedy and comedy often intersect, thereby amplifying the emotional and intellectual impact of the dramatic narrative. On the one hand, their Kafkaesque strands may align the work with tragedy, as typically blameless characters suffer in their struggle with insurmountable and incomprehensible forces, thus mirroring the helplessness of tragic heroes. On the other hand, these influences may align the plays with comedy of the dark sort, typically associated with Absurdist Theatre, through the use of irony, absurdity and the grotesque, as characters find themselves in situations disheartening yet humorous in their bizarre exaggeration. In Kafkaesque-inspired theatrical spaces, tragedy often becomes absurd, while comedy becomes wicked; ambiguity prevails and mirrors the tragicomic mode of modern existence which lacks catharsis, resolution or hope for closure. Audiences are challenged to cry, laugh and question the disturbing familiarity of what’s depicted on stage. The theatrical works analyzed in the essays that comprise this Special Topic testify to the intriguing complexity of the Kafkaesque.

Taken as a whole, Special Topic #30 seeks to explore Kafka’s influence on contemporary theatre. Our collection of fourteen essays critically explores Kafka’s legacy and its manifestation in contemporary drama and performance. The essays examine how different theatre-makers but also scholars from around the world interpret the Kafkaesque universe, dramatizing its key themes, dramaturgically reworking its motifs to reflect and critique contemporary anxieties, discussing its impact in specific contexts, while in many cases also investing in an interplay of the tragic and the comic mode. As noted in the essays, Kafka’s works blur the boundaries between tragedy and comedy, reality and illusion; hence, theatre practitioners who are drawn into the orbit of the Kafkaesque are forced to confront related questions of selfhood, power and representation through challenging blends of Kafkaesque materials in theatrical works that frequently defy convention and expectation. Not surprisingly, the essays in this volume cover a diverse range of topics, united by a common concern with Kafka’s themes and their theatrical incarnations.

The first article, by Zuzana Augustová, situates Kafka within the literary traditions of Expressionism, Surrealism and Theatre of the Absurd, examining how his oeuvre’s timeless literary quality has inspired theatre and visual arts over the past century. This exploration establishes the foundational argument for Kafka’s enduring relevance in artistic practices. Next, Hana Strejčková’s article takes a vibrant detour into the realm of performance art, highlighting the interpretive richness of Kafka’s works as seen in Daniel Gulko’s K project. By framing Kafka’s narratives as modern fairy tales, it underscores the adaptability of his themes in contemporary creative projects. Also interested in Kafka’s enduring resonance but also in theatre’s digital turn, Martin Boszorád offers an investigation of Kafka’s work as a form of parrhesia, or truth-telling, within a theatrical context through his treatment of the digital performance The Neighbor by Theater in Quarantine. Boszorád’s perspective aligns Kafka’s legacy with the challenges and opportunities of digital storytelling.

Reflecting on Slovak theatre, the fourth article, by Dária Fojtíková Fehérová, juxtaposes Kafka’s absurdist themes with productions that explore yet complicate notions of national identity and cultural heroism. Fehérová’s approach reveals the intersections between the Kafkaesque and narratives of key historical and political import that, in their complex nuances, still shape the country’s future. Tomoko Seki’s contribution also addresses the connection between Kafkaesque-inflected aesthetics and politics, albeit through a different route. The author explores Kafka’s motifs of deferred judgment as a link to contemporary theatrical works that focus on justice and catharsis. This discussion reveals Kafka’s influence on narrative structures that resist traditional resolutions, and the sociopolitical stakes involved in such dramaturgical choices.

Following this, Cecilia Djurberg takes up the critical question of how theatre questions not only the concept of reality in a post-truth era dominated by digital platforms and surveillance capitalism but also its own identity in this context. Her article highlights the merging of physical and digital lives and the chaotic, Kafkaesque search for truth in contemporary theatre, which often employs what the author calls “meta-storytelling” in its effort to make sense of an elusive reality, as well as help people make sense of it. Another contribution centered on the reverberations of the Kafkaesque in the present, multiply remediated political sphere is authored by Ioanna Lioutsia, who likens the influence of cancel culture, originally utilized by the ultra-right to demean minority cultures, to the often-mysterious power dynamics permeating Kafka’s works. Her essay discusses how demands for so-called political correctness and online activism mirror Kafka’s invisible court, potentially stifling creativity and democratic debate within and without the theatre. Lioutsia emphasizes the need for open dialogue and critical reflection to safeguard the central role of the theatre in education and society at large.

In his article, Jean-Pierre Han recognizes Kafka’s brilliance in his ability to create works open to diverse interpretation while maintaining meticulous precision in the depiction of settings and the physical and moral dimensions of his characters. Even more sharply tuned to physicality and embodiment in theatre, Penelope Chatzidimitriou’s article delves into the seemingly paradoxical relationship between Kafka’s writings and the theatre, using A Report to an Academy as a case study. By focusing on bodily performance and the aesthetics of aliveness, Chatzidimitriou demonstrates how directors reimagine Kafka’s work within the constraints of theatrical embodiment. Matti Linnavuori’s contribution also emphasizes the role of physicality in creating layers of meaning, linking the aesthetics of performance to deeper cultural critiques. Linnavuori draws connections between the acting techniques of Charlie Chaplin and the Finnish theatre visionary Jouko Turkka, and in so doing he reveals an underlying aesthetic quality shared with Kafka: an exploration of seemingly insignificant gestures imbued with significant sociopolitically charged meaning. This provides an interesting exploration of the notion that bodily performance functions as a space for exploring the interplay between the physical and the ideological.

Shifting from the West to the East in the theatrical reception of the Kafkaesque, the essay, by Peng Tao, examines adaptations of Kafka’s works in mainland China. He shows how directors use allegory and metaphor to critique the modern-day cage of instrumental rationality, and thus emphasizes Kafka’s influence within a non-Western context. Foregrounding the co-presence and productive combination of Western and non-Western theatre poetics, Bernice Chan’s and Huiwen Shi’s article chronicles the works of Alice Theatre Laboratory to highlight the fusion of Kafkaesque absurdity with Butoh-inspired physicality to depict alienation and fantasy in contemporary Hong Kong society. Hwawon Lee, next, explores the presence of the Kafkaesque in Korean theatre. Specifically, she contemplates the ethical tensions surrounding Max Brod’s decision to preserve Kafka’s unpublished works, while framing this act within broader discussions of truth and grotesque irony in Korean theatre. Bridging the early modern and the postmodern as well as East and West, the final essay, by Tomoka Tsukamoto and Ted Motohashi, shows how Kafkaesque’s tragicomic frequencies ripple through Satoshi Miyagi’s Miyagi-Noh Othello, which reclaims Desdemona’s voice and highlights suppressed narratives of women through innovative Japanese dramaturgy, thereby offering a fresh perspective on the popular Shakespearean classic as a meditation on collective suffering, spiritual atonement and enduring love amidst societal divisions.

The studies included in this Special Topic reaffirm the enduring power and relevance of the Kafkaesque universe in a world increasingly afflicted by alienation, ambiguity and the oppressive weight of incomprehensible structures. In particular, they illustrate how theatre, with its unique capacity to merge the visceral with the intellectual, provides a vital space for exploring and confronting the absurdities and injustices of our contemporary existence. That’s true regardless of whether the production that dramatizes Kafka’s themes is staged within the intimate realm of a digital performance or projected through the grandeur of a national stage. The collection reveals the profound impact of Kafka’s ideas on contemporary theatre, confirming that his work remains a driving force in shaping theatrical aesthetics.

Through its diverse global perspectives, the 30th Special Topic of Critical Stages/Scènes critiques bridges past and present, tragedy and comedy, West and East, offering a kaleidoscopic view of the Kafkaesque in performance. Ultimately, it asserts that Kafka’s unique lens, his blend of the tragic and the absurd, continues to guide theatre practitioners to craft stage narratives that provoke, disturb and inspire; as a result, artists and audiences alike are compelled to grapple with the unsettling truths of our own Kafkaesque era, truths about identity, authority and morality. By uniting literary analysis, performance studies and cultural critique, this Special Topic underscores the essential role of theatre in making sense of our fractured world and forging paths toward critical engagement and collective understanding.

Cover Photo: Josephine the Singer and her mouse nation. K, director Daniel Gulko, Cirk La Putyka, Jatka 78, Czech Republic 2023. Photo: Lukáš Bíba (from: “Kafka as a Starting Point for Circus Art” by Hana Strejčková). 


*Aikaterini Delikonstantinidou is Assistant Professor, Faculty of English Language and Literature, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece, where she specializes in contemporary Anglophone theater. She completed her PhD. at Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, exploring the reception of the ancient Greek tragic myth in the Latino/american theater. She subsequently completed post-doctoral research on the applications of myth-based digital theater in adult education, Department of Theatre Studies, University of Athens, Greece. Delikonstantinidou has co-edited special issues of academic journals and has published articles in Greek and international journals, as well as in collective volumes, and has presented her research at conferences in Greece and abroad. Her monograph, titled Latinx Reception of Greek Tragic Myth: Healing (and) Radical Politics was published in 2020 by Peter Lang. Her most recent paper, “Emotional Literacy via the System for Digital Theater in Education,” is included in the collective volume Stanislavsky and Emotion: Approaches Through Language & Culture (forthcoming, Routledge). Her scholarly interests lie in contemporary theatre, reception studies, digital humanities and ecocriticism.

Copyright © 2024 Aikaterini Delikonstantinidou
Critical Stages/Scènes critiques, #30, Dec. 2024
e-ISSN: 2409-7411

Creative Commons Attribution International License

This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution International License CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.