{"id":454,"date":"2025-11-12T18:26:05","date_gmt":"2025-11-12T18:26:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/32\/?p=454"},"modified":"2026-06-20T07:43:56","modified_gmt":"2026-06-20T07:43:56","slug":"michael-chekhov-16-lessons-in-kaunas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/32\/michael-chekhov-16-lessons-in-kaunas\/","title":{"rendered":"Michael Chekhov: 16\u00a0Lessons in Kaunas"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Joerg Andrees and Amina Zhaman, eds.<\/strong><br><strong>Berlin: Edition Immanente, 352 pp.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-right wp-block-paragraph\">Reviewed by <strong>Lenka Pichl\u00edkov\u00e1-Burke<\/strong><a href=\"#end\" name=\"back\">*<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The year 2025 was the 70<sup>th<\/sup>&nbsp;anniversary of the passing, on September 30, 1955, of Michael A. Chekhov, the Russian-born actor, theatre studio director, dramatic theorist, and pedagogue. Today, Chekhov\u2019s acting technique attracts thousands of practitioners who work on stage, film, and television, as well as scores of teachers in private studios and universities internationally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From February 1932 to May 1934, Chekhov visited the Baltic States, acting, directing, and teaching in Latvia and Kaunas, Lithuania (working with his former Moscow Art Theatre colleague Andrius Oleka-\u017dilinskas, called Zilinsky or Jilinsky in English). At Kaunas, one of Chekhov\u2019s acting students, Romualdas Juknevi\u010dius, took notes in Russian on 16 lessons, documenting one of the few surviving articulations of Chekhov\u2019s early studio classroom technique. These are now available in this valuable trilingual edition, edited by Joerg Andrees and Amina Zhaman. The publication also contains a letter Chekhov wrote in 1933 about his concept of what he called \u201cAtmospheres\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In addition to complete transcriptions of the lesson notes in the original Russian with translation in English and German, there are separate Forewords by the editors \u2013 Andrees provides a list of nine themes to guide the reader using categories such as Rhythm, Atmospheres, and the role of the human spirit as a guiding force. There is also an introductory essay by Aldona Adomaityt\u00e9 and Aleksandras Guobys, who published the lessons in Russian in 1989 (Moscow: Gitis).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Following the lessons is a remembrance by Per Brahe (\u201cMy Kaunas Paper\u201d) of his arrival in Moscow with a group of his Danish students in the watershed year of 1989, which was also the year of the Russian edition and its notable effect on Russian theatre pedagogy. Brahe includes perceptive comments on work with masks as a means of specific language.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Justina Kasponyte, the scholar who first analyzed the lessons in depth for an English-speaking audience, provides a valuable discussion of the lessons and the associated illustrations (also published in the current volume.) There is also a brief bibliography. Unfortunately, the volume has no index.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Kaunas lessons, and those taught during the same period in Riga are closely influenced by Chekhov\u2019s \u201cPariser Manuskript,\u201d written in German during 1932-34 in collaboration with Georgette Boner, Chekhov\u2019s patron and co-producer of productions in Paris in 1931 and a frequent visitor to Chekhov and his wife in Latvia. Indeed, since the exercises that accompanied the \u201cPariser Manuskript\u201d are lost, the Kaunas lessons in effect complete that text, recently translated by Hugo Moss [Chekhov 1932\/2025].<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A number of the lessons underscore Chekhov\u2019s application of Rudolf Steiner\u2019s Anthroposophy to dramatic theory and often look forward to constant elements in Chekhov\u2019s future pedagogy. To begin with the latter, from the very first lesson, Chekhov uses exercises involving tossing balls, juggling, group exercises in body sculpting, movement through imaginary water, and other staples of his psycho-physical training. With regard to Steiner, one finds, for example, in the Tenth Lesson, Chekhov developing particular aspects of the actor\u2019s mental \u201csoul\u201d [psyche] through group exercises and using color theory to add qualities to movements.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The following lesson, introduces Chekhov\u2019s idea, reinforced by Steiner, of the \u201cthree-membered\u201d (\u0442\u0440\u0435\u0445\u0447\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043do\u0439) or \u201ctripartite\u201d human being, which consists of the physical body, the mental \u201csoul\u201d (that is, psyche), and the \u201cspirit\u201d (what is also called in English, \u201cthe immortal soul.\u201d) [70]. He then introduces the concepts of the \u201cpersonality\u201d (\u043b\u0438\u0447\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c)\u2013 the visible, corporeal human being \u2013 \u0432\u0438\u0434\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0435 \u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0447\u0435\u043b\u043e\u0432\u0435\u043a\u0430) versus the \u201cindividuality\u201d (\u0438\u043d\u0434\u0438\u0432\u0438\u0434\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c)\u2013 a collaboration between the human mental soul [psyche] and the spirit, in search of a higher consciousness).&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here, the parallels with the \u201cPariser Manuskript\u201d are exact. The images that Chekhov used as an inspiration for the students \u2013 also included in&nbsp;<em>16 Lessons in Kaunas&nbsp;<\/em>\u2013are also paralleled in the <em>Pariser Manuskript<\/em>. In the final image [Fig. 5], the actor is compared to a goblet-like vessel that, having reached a higher consciousness and embodied the inner images of the character, finally radiates to the audience.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Worth noting: at the end of the seventh lesson, Chekhov describes an exercise [58-9], which is perhaps the original text of what Chekhov practitioners call&nbsp;the&nbsp;<em>Actor\u2019s March. <\/em>The Fourteenth Lesson includes an extended discussion of the relationship between the actor and the director, described as one of mutual love, with the actor revealing his soul under inspiration from the director [84-6]. The passage reminded me of what Chekhov said about his teacher and close friend, the director Yevgeny Vakhtangov who \u201cdid not play&nbsp;the role <em>instead<\/em> of the actor, but he&nbsp;<em>acted out<\/em>&nbsp;the general outlines of the role, [sketching out] one entire act in no more than two minutes. After his&nbsp;demonstration<em>,<\/em>&nbsp;the entire act with all its details was clear to me<a>&#8230;<\/a>\u201d (Chekhov 1928; 2005, 69-71).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Fifteenth Lesson urges students to \u201cturn [more] to the invisible.\u201d This relates to Chekhov\u2019s concern with the Theatre of the Future.&nbsp;An extremely important addition to Chekhov\u2019s lessons in Kaunas was a letter on what he called Atmospheres (4 October 1933), written at Zilinsky\u2019s request for his students, first published in 1936.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A few small corrections should be noted here in the essay by Adomaityt\u00e9 and Guobys:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8211;the date of Chekhov\u2019s emigration from Russia took place in July 1928 (Chekkov 2005, 69-71);<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8212; they suggest that Zilinsky and Chekhov played in the \u201cMAT Prague Group.\u201d In fact, though Chekhov had performed successfully in Prague in 1922, their work never coincided in Prague;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8212; Zilinsky and his actress wife, Vera Solovieva, came to New York with Chekhov in 1935.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As well,&nbsp;the Sixteenth lesson is dated erroneously 2 September 1932, A footnote [92n5] says that \u201cprevious editions\u201d had suggested 2 November. The correct date might be 2 October, or, given that Chekhov was directing Zilinsky in <em>Hamlet <\/em>(opened 11 October), and then returned to Riga toplay the role of Hamlet himself (opened 21 October), he may have actually finished the lessons on 2 November.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Of interest here, both in the <em>Pariser Manuskript<\/em> and the Kaunas lessons, is that Chekhov uses terms strongly reinforced by his poet colleague and tutor in Steiner\u2019s Anthroposophy, Andrei Bely (1880-1934).&nbsp;Bely, following Steiner, spoke often of \u201cindividuality\u201d and \u201cpersonality\u201d in his own writings and in lessons given on Anthroposophy in Chekhov\u2019s apartment, 1924-26. This system remains in place throughout Chekhov\u2019s career, although the names change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In sum, this trilingual publication of <em>16 Lessons in Kaunas<\/em> is extremely important as a completion of the articulation of Chekhov\u2019s dramatic method and provides a large number of exercises that will be of great interest to Chekhov practitioners today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity is-style-wide\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Bibliography<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Chekhov, Michael. <em>The Path of the Actor<\/em>. Edited by Andrei Kirillov and Bella Merlin, translated by D. Ball, Routledge, 2005. Originally published 1928.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">[Chekhov] Tschechow, Michael, and Georgette Boner. <em>Michael Chekhov Schauspiel-Technik, 1932\u20131934: Pariser Manuskript<\/em>. Edited by Georgette Boner, Z\u00fcrich, ZHdK-Archiv Boner Papers, n.d. [ca. 1932\u201334]. Archive no. EFB-2008-E001-0059.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Chekhov, Michael. <em>The Paris Manuscript: The Early Draft Rediscovered<\/em>. Edited and translated by Hugo Moss and Georgette Boner, Methuen Drama\/Bloomsbury, 2025. Originally written 1932\u201334.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Chekhov, Michael. <em>Apiem aktoriausk\u00faryba<\/em>. Edited by J. Grybauskas and K. Ka\u010dinskas, Spaudosfondas, 1936.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Kasponyte, Justina. <em>Stanislavski&#8217;s Directors: Michael Chekhov and the Revolution in Lithuanian Theatre of the 1930s<\/em>. University of Glasgow, 2012. <em>University of Glasgow Theses<\/em>.<a name=\"end\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity is-style-wide\"\/>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full alignnone\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.critical-stages.org\/32\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/33\/2025\/11\/Lenka-Pichlikova-Burke.jpg?resize=150%2C150&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-456\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a name=\"end\" href=\"#back\">*<\/a><strong>Lenka Pichl\u00edkov\u00e1-Burke, <\/strong>actress and mime,<strong> &nbsp;<\/strong>has long been a researcher into the theatrical pedagogy of Michael Chekhov. The editor of a two-volume study of his work published by Routledge, she holds an MFA and PhD from the Faculty of Dramatic Arts (DAMU) in Prague and a Certificate of Completition from the Michael Chekhov Association (MICHA).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">Copyright <strong>\u00a9<\/strong> 2025 Lenka Pichl\u00edkov\u00e1-Burke<br><em>Critical Stages\/Sc\u00e8nes critiques<\/em>,&nbsp;#32, December 2025<br>e-ISSN: 2409-7411<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.critical-stages.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/88x31.png?w=800&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"Creative Commons Attribution International License\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">This work is licensed under the<br>Creative Commons Attribution International License CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":455,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-454","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-book-reviews"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.critical-stages.org\/32\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/33\/2025\/11\/image1.jpg?fit=268%2C400&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/32\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/454","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/32\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/32\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/32\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/32\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=454"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/32\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/454\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1004,"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/32\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/454\/revisions\/1004"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/32\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/455"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/32\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=454"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/32\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=454"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/32\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=454"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}