{"id":389,"date":"2025-05-08T19:44:03","date_gmt":"2025-05-08T19:44:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/31\/?p=389"},"modified":"2025-06-26T19:29:47","modified_gmt":"2025-06-26T19:29:47","slug":"quels-roles-pour-le-spectateur-a-lere-numerique","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/31\/quels-roles-pour-le-spectateur-a-lere-numerique\/","title":{"rendered":"Quels r\u00f4les pour le spectateur \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e8re num\u00e9rique?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>By Simon Hagemann and Izabella Pluta<\/strong><br><strong>Lausanne, Switzerland: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes. 211 pp.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-right wp-block-paragraph\">Reviewed by<strong> Lou Gargouri<\/strong><a href=\"#end\" name=\"back\">*<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">First a word about the two authors. Simon Hagemann is an Associate Professor of Communication at the Universit\u00e9 de Lorraine. His work focuses on the intersections of theatre, video games, history, and media innovation. Izabella Pluta, a theatre critic and translator, is an independent researcher affiliated with the Centre d\u2019\u00e9tudes th\u00e9\u00e2trales at the Universit\u00e9 de Lausanne. She co-edits <em>Critiques<\/em>, a journal dedicated to digital performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In their book <em>Quels r\u00f4les pour le spectateur \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e8re num\u00e9rique ?<\/em>, Hagemann and Pluta offer in French a methodical exploration of the evolving relationship between audiences and live performance in the digital age.<a href=\"#end1\" name=\"back1\"><sup>[1]<\/sup><\/a> This volume joins a growing corpus of work focused on technology and performance, extending reflections found in foundational works like Steve Dixon\u2019s <em>Digital Performance<\/em> (2007) and Quebec professor Josette F\u00e9ral\u2019s more recent <em>La vid\u00e9o en sc\u00e8ne<\/em> (2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Structured in nine chapters, their study ranges from terminological clarification to speculative futures involving artificial intelligence. The framework enables the authors to develop an in-depth analysis of emerging spectatorial postures shaped by digital technology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Their first chapter \u2013 \u201cA Critical Genealogy of the Spectator and Its Metamorphoses\u201d &#8212; undertakes an inquiry into how audiences are labeled and understood. Drawing from the work of Christian Ruby and Patrice Pavis, the authors unpack the implications of terms such as \u201cspectator,\u201d \u201cpublic,\u201d \u201caudience,\u201d \u201cparticipant,\u201d \u201cspect-actor\u201d (Boal), and \u201cexperimenter.\u201d As they emphasize, \u201cthe important thing is not the word used, but what its use implies\u201d (30). This lexicon proves crucial for interpreting the shifting modes of theatrical reception.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">They also trace the evolution of the stage-audience dynamic, from ancient civic theatre and medieval liturgical drama, to the bourgeois theatre\u2019s disciplinarian gaze (Bennett), and the radical reengagement of the historical avant-gardes (Dadaism, Futurism, Constructivism). These genealogies underline that today\u2019s concerns with audience engagement are rooted in long-standing debates around the role of the public in performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the chapter called \u201cThe Digital Turn and Sensory Implications\u201dthey contextualize the rise of a \u201cdigital society\u201d and its implications for theatre. Post-humanism and trans-humanism are introduced as conceptual backdrops for the evolving status of the spectator, with reference to Rosi Braidotti, N. Katherine Hayles, and Donna Haraway. These frameworks help articulate how digital technologies challenge human exceptionalism and reshape performance ontology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of the book\u2019s most original contributions appears in a chapter called \u201cAu royaume des sens,\u201d which investigates how digital devices engage the five senses. Referencing Marshall McLuhan\u2019s theory of \u201ctechnological extensions of man\u201d&nbsp;and Paul Virilio\u2019s notion of \u201cvisionics\u201d , the authors analyze how technological performance reconfigures perception. Examples from CREW (Belgium), \u00c9ric Joris\u2019s VR projects, and INVIVO\u2019s sound installations illustrate what they call a \u201crenewal of perception\u201d (p. 97), extending well beyond traditional audio-visual registers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The heart of the book presents a compelling typology of three emerging figures:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Le spectateur-immersant (Chapter 5) who is immersed in artificially constructed environments via VR. Building on Catherine Bouko\u2019s three-tiered model of immersion and Doris Kolesch\u2019s idea of a \u201cdynamic of fluctuation\u201d. The authors analyze works like <em>Brainwaves<\/em> (RGB Project, 2021, Switzerland) and <em>Symphony of a Missing Room<\/em> (Lundahl &amp; Seitl, UK, 2014\u20132017).<br><br><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Le spectateur-interacteur (Chapter 6) directly intervenes in the performance. Drawing a distinction between \u201cinteraction\u201d and \u201cinteractivity\u201d as defined by Pavis, the authors also refer to Steve Dixon\u2019s typology. Notable case studies include <em>Epizoo<\/em> (1994) and <em>Protomembrana<\/em> (2006) by Marcel\u00b7l\u00ed Ant\u00fanez Roca, both of which probe questions of autonomy and agency.<br><br><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Le spectateur-joueur (Chapter 7) is one who participates through gamified structures. Drawing on Johan Huizinga and Roger Caillois, the authors examine projects like <em>Best Before<\/em> (Rimini Protokoll, 2010) and <em>Yet Another World<\/em> (Extraleben, 2012), framing them through Christian Rakow\u2019s concept of \u201cGame-Theatre.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">What distinguishes this typology is not only its clarity but its interdisciplinary reach\u2014engaging theatre studies, media theory, cognitive science, and ludology. The analysis convincingly demonstrates how digital theatre invents new forms of embodied, participatory presence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Beyond mapping technologies, Hagemann and Pluta critically address their socio-political implications. Chapter 8 explores whether interactivity fosters emancipation or reproduces neo-liberal logics. Echoing Jacques Ranci\u00e8re\u2019s <em>Le spectateur \u00e9mancip\u00e9<\/em> and Olivier Neveux\u2019s <em>Politiques du spectateur<\/em>, the authors challenge the idea that participation equals liberation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Following Adam Alston, they suggest that participatory theatre may reward entrepreneurial spectatorship, echoing dominant economic ideologies. However, performances like <em>To Like or Not To Like<\/em> (Interrobang, 2015) or <em>Regiodrom<\/em> (Klaus Gehre, 2013) demonstrate how digital tools can expose surveillance, data manipulation, and contemporary power structures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Geographically, the examples range across Germany, Denmark, Belgium, France and Switzerland, with sustained attention to projects by Or Normes and Yan Duyvendak. This breadth affirms the vitality and diversity of European digital theatre traditions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The final chapter turns to AI and machine spectatorship. Examining <em>dSimon<\/em> (Simon Senn and Tammara Leites) and <em>La vall\u00e9e de l\u2019\u00e9trange<\/em> (Stefan Kaegi), the authors question what it means to perform for or with artificial agents. Masahiro Mori\u2019s \u201cuncanny valley\u201d theory proves useful here, as the affective dynamics of theatre collide with synthetic presence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Robotic performers like those in <em>Sayonara<\/em> (Oriza Hirata) or <em>Dancer #3<\/em> (Kris Verdonck) suggest that theatre may not only represent the posthuman, but embody it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Thanks to its conceptual clarity, breadth of examples, and critical engagement, <em>Quels r\u00f4les pour le spectateur \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e8re num\u00e9rique ?<\/em> establishes itself as a landmark text. The book strikes a careful balance between analytical rigor and accessibility, making it valuable for scholars, artists, and students alike.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Hagemann and Pluta avoid technological determinism, instead presenting theatre as a laboratory for interrogating embodiment, collectivity, and attention in an age of mediation. Far from threatening theatre\u2019s core, digital performance\u2014when critically understood\u2014emerges as a site of aesthetic, political, and ethical experimentation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity is-style-wide\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a href=\"#_ednref1\" id=\"_edn1\"><\/a><strong>Endnote<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph\"><a name=\"end1\" href=\"#back1\"><sup>[1]<\/sup><\/a> Simon Hagemann is also the author of <em>Penser les m\u00e9dias au th\u00e9\u00e2tre<\/em> (Harmattan, 2013). In this book, he has already analyzed the relationships between theatre and media from the historical avant-gardes to contemporary scenes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Bibliography<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Alston, Adam<em>. Beyond Immersive Theatre: Aesthetics, Politics and Productive Participation<\/em>. Palgrave, 2016.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Bennett, Susan<em>. Theatre Audiences. A Theory of Production and Reception<\/em>. Routledge, 1997.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Braidotti, Rosi. <em>The Posthuman<\/em>. Polity Press, 2013.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Bouko, Catherine. &#8220;Le th\u00e9\u00e2tre immersif : une d\u00e9finition en trois paliers.&#8221; <em>Soci\u00e9t\u00e9<\/em>, vol. 134, no. 4, 2016, pp. 55-65.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Caillois, Roger<em>. Les jeux et les hommes : le masque et le vertige<\/em>. Gallimard, 2012 [1958].<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Dixon, Steve. <em>Digital Performance: A History of New Media in Theatre, Dance, Performance Art, and Installation<\/em>. MIT Press, 2007.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">F\u00e9ral, Josette et Julie-Mich\u00e8le Morin. <em>La vid\u00e9o en sc\u00e8ne : l&#8217;acteur et ses technologies<\/em>. Presses universitaires de Vincennes, 2022.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Haraway, Donna. &#8220;A Cyborg Manifesto.&#8221; <em>The Cultural Studies Reader<\/em>, edited by Simon During. Routledge\/Taylor and Francis Group, 1999 [1984].<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Hayles, Nancy Katherine. <em>How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics<\/em>. U of Chicago P, 1999.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Huizinga, Johan<em>. Homo Ludens. Essai sur la fonction sociale du jeu<\/em>, C\u00e9cile Seresia (trad.).&nbsp;Gallimard, 2014 [1938].<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Kolesch, Doris. &#8220;Immersion and Spectatorship at the Interface of Theatre, Media Tech and Daily Life. An Introduction.&#8221; <em>Staging Spectators in Immersive Performances. Commit Yourself!<\/em>, edited by Doris Kolesch, Theresa Sch\u00fctz and Sophie Nikoleit, Routledge, 2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">McLuhan, Marshall. <em>Pour comprendre les m\u00e9dias. Les prolongements technologiques de l&#8217;homme<\/em>, Jean Par\u00e9 (trad.). Mame\/Le Seuil, 1968.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Mori, Masahiro. &#8220;The Uncanny Valley Phenomenon.&#8221; <em>Energy<\/em>, vol. 7, no. 4, 1970, pp. 33-35.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Neveux, Olivier. <em>Politiques du spectateur : les enjeux du th\u00e9\u00e2tre politique aujourd&#8217;hui<\/em>. La D\u00e9couverte, 2013.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Pavis, Patrice<em>. Dictionnaire de la performance et du th\u00e9\u00e2tre contemporain<\/em>. Armand Colin, 2014.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Ranci\u00e8re, Jacques<em>. Le spectateur \u00e9mancip\u00e9<\/em>. La Fabrique, 2008.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">&nbsp;Ruby, Christian. <em>La figure du spectateur. \u00c9l\u00e9ments d&#8217;histoire culturelle europ\u00e9enne<\/em>. Armand Colin, 2012.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"hangingIndent wp-block-paragraph\">Virilio, Paul. <em>La machine de vision<\/em>. Galil\u00e9e, 1988.<a name=\"end\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity is-style-wide\"\/>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-thumbnail alignnone\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.critical-stages.org\/31\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/32\/2025\/05\/Lou-Gargouri.jpeg?resize=150%2C150&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-391\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.critical-stages.org\/31\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/32\/2025\/05\/Lou-Gargouri.jpeg?resize=150%2C150&amp;ssl=1 150w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.critical-stages.org\/31\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/32\/2025\/05\/Lou-Gargouri.jpeg?w=300&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a name=\"end\" href=\"#back\">*<\/a><strong>Lou Gargouri<\/strong> is a theatre practitioner and PhD candidate in French literature and theatre at the University of Chicago. Her research focuses on francophone theatre, political performance, and feminist solo work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">Copyright <strong>\u00a9<\/strong> 2025 Lou Gargouri<br><em>Critical Stages\/Sc\u00e8nes critiques<\/em>,&nbsp;#31, June 2025<br>e-ISSN: 2409-7411<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.critical-stages.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/88x31.png?w=800&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"Creative Commons Attribution International License\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">This work is licensed under the<br>Creative Commons Attribution International License CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":390,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-389","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-book-reviews"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.critical-stages.org\/31\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/32\/2025\/05\/image1-4.jpg?fit=263%2C400&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/31\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/389","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/31\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/31\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/31\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/31\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=389"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/31\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/389\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":752,"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/31\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/389\/revisions\/752"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/31\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/390"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/31\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/31\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=389"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.critical-stages.org\/31\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}